Categories
News

New DeFi Species: Understanding “Encrypted Structured Products” Ribbon Finance (www.blockcast.cc)

Ribbon Finance combines different DeFi derivatives to achieve specific risk goals.

Written by: a poplar tree

In the past 2020, we have witnessed incredible DeFi innovation and experienced the explosive growth of the DeFi world. In particular, the DeFi development level covering decentralized transactions, lending, options, fixed income, algorithmic stablecoins, synthetic assets, etc., has become more and more diversified, almost following the pattern of traditional mainstream finance. .

These continuously innovative and iterative DeFi protocols have also created diversified new profit possibilities for ordinary people-lending assets, providing liquidity to automated market makers, casting synthetic assets, and so on.

The “Lego” attribute of DeFi is naturally suitable for constructing structured products that combine different protocols to achieve specific risk goals.

What is a structured product?

Structured products are essentially a combination of financial derivatives. It usually combines a series of derivatives to construct a “combined product” that achieves specific risk goals.

Its advantages are obvious, because although there are a wealth of derivatives tools that can play a combination advantage in trading, there are only a few experienced traders after all, and most people do not know how to incorporate derivatives into their overall portfolio strategy to improve Risk return, this is where structured products come in:

Packing multiple derivative products into one product, anyone can buy it without worrying about the complexity of the structure, in a broad sense, it can be understood as all financial products tailored to customers.

But this also brings a series of problems-extremely opaque, brokers may not be able to honor payments, investment channels are greatly restricted due to geographic location, and only high-net-worth individuals or financial institutions can use it.

New DeFi Species: Understanding "Encrypted Structured Products" Ribbon Finance

What is Ribbon Finance?

This is exactly the vision of Ribbon Finance as an encrypted structured product-removing investment thresholds, bringing new variables to the structured product market, so that any investor with a Metamask wallet can easily participate in investing in structured products.

Because of this, Ribbon Finance chose to focus on creating encrypted structured products on DeFi, and by building new DeFi products that can be combined through cross-DeFi agreements, to help DeFi users obtain a higher risk-reward ratio.

Ribbon currently includes four major product categories, including betting on volatility, increasing returns, principal protection, and compound interest. Each category has a series of specific products to provide users with different risk-return goals with differentiated services.

New DeFi Species: Understanding "Encrypted Structured Products" Ribbon Finance

  • Betting on volatility: Allow users to trade various crypto asset volatility products for speculative or hedging purposes
  • Increase revenue: through the combination of different rate of return tools (with revenue options), allowing users to earn high-yield active and passive products
  • Principal protection: investment products to ensure that users will recover their principal, plus potential upside advantages. They can be constructed through a combination of fixed income products and options
  • Compound interest: A product that allows users to gradually and stably accumulate their favorite assets through strategies such as automatically selling put options and reinvesting the proceeds in accumulating more assets

The founder of Ribbon Finance is Julian Koh, a former Coinbase software engineer. LinkedIn personal information shows that Julian Koh worked at Coinbase from May 2019 to October 2020. In 2018, he served as a consultant for the cryptocurrency hedge fund MetaStable Capital.

How does Ribbon Finance achieve its goals?

Take the product of betting on volatility-Strangle option as an example. This is also Ribbon’s first product. It allows users to bet on the volatility of ETH for profit by combining put options and call options with different execution prices.

New DeFi Species: Understanding "Encrypted Structured Products" Ribbon Finance

In order to build this combined product, Ribbon simultaneously obtains liquidity from the two major option agreements on Ethereum, Hegic and Opyn.

First, Ribbon will find the cheapest price for option buyers and sellers from Hegic and Opyn, and then purchase options on behalf of users and package them into smart contracts to build a portfolio of products that bet on ETH volatility.

At present, there are two contract options for Strangle options based on the expiration date-March 12 and March 16, corresponding to different contract costs and return profits.

New DeFi Species: Understanding "Encrypted Structured Products" Ribbon Finance

However, the more frequent and greater the price fluctuation of ETH during the contract period, the more profit. This is also the first multi-protocol structured product betting on volatility on Ethereum.

The three product areas of revenue enhancement, principal protection and compound interest are currently under development and are expected to be launched later. The official has also confirmed that there are two main directions to proceed:

  • Continuous integration with other on-chain option protocols to obtain better prices for users and create more complex products;
  • Develop a permanent structured product that earns income on ETH by selling options;

It is important to note that as of now, Ribbon Finance has not issued its own tokens, and tokens of the same name appearing on chains such as BSC need to pay special attention to risks.

How big is the imagination of encrypted structured products?

In the traditional financial world, structured products are generally based on fixed-income investments, coupled with a combination of financial derivatives. Usually the financial assets that can be linked to derivatives include stocks, bonds, interest rates, foreign exchange, Various indexes, bulks, funds, etc. (commonly such as ABS, structured wealth management, structured deposits, etc.) have developed rapidly in recent years and have become powerful tools for asset management because they closely follow the individual needs of investors.

In the crypto market, there is also a “structured product” model that has been practiced for a long time-digital asset dual currency wealth management products, as a floating return non-guaranteed investment product, characterized by “one investment, two returns” .

Take the BTC standard as an example

The investor purchased a 10-day “BTC-USD dual currency wealth management” product on March 1. Assuming that the BTC quoted at US$49,200 on that day, other relevant parameters are as follows:

  • Linked price: $49,400
  • Expiry date: March 11
  • Investment amount: 1 BTC
  • Yield: 3%

At the expiry date of March 11, there will be two possible settlement methods:

  • If the settlement price of BTC is lower than the pegged price of 49,400 US dollars, the settlement will be done in BTC. The settlement amount = (1 + yield) * purchase quantity = (1 + 3%) * 1 = 1.03 BTC.
  • If the settlement price of BTC is higher than or equal to the pegged price of 49,400 US dollars, the settlement will be done in USD, and the settlement amount = (1 + yield) * pegged price = (1 + 3%) * 49400 = 508825 USD.

Take the USD standard as an example

The investor bought an 11-day “USD-BTC dual currency wealth management” product on March 1. Assuming that the BTC quoted at US$49,200 on that day, other relevant parameters are as follows:

  • Linked price: US$49,000
  • Expiry date: March 11
  • Investment amount: US$49,200
  • Yield: 3%

At the expiry date of March 11, there will also be two possible settlement methods:

  • If the settlement price of USD-BTC is lower than or equal to the pegged price of 49,000 USD, investors will settle in BTC. Settlement amount = purchase quantity / pegged price*(1+3%)=49200/19,000*(1+3%) )=1.0408 BTC.
  • If the settlement price of USD-BTC is higher than the linked price of 19,000 USD, investors will settle in USD. The settlement amount = (1 + yield) * linked price = (1 + 3%) * 49000 = 50470USD.

In a nutshell, although the BTC-USD settlement price will change on the expiry date, investors will always get a 3% definite return. The only uncertainty is the type of funds returned (BTC or USD).

I believe everyone has discovered that the hedging and risk hedging characteristics of similar options above are more suitable for constructing diversified structured financial products than the “fixed income + derivatives” in traditional finance.

In the crypto world, with the help of smart contracts, liquidity can be obtained from various on-chain derivatives agreements (including option products such as Hegic), and they can be combined freely and efficiently to achieve certain specific risk goals. At the same time, 100% transparency is maintained at all times.

Especially when different track DeFi protocols are combined like Lego-when a variety of DeFi financial instruments (options, fixed income, futures, etc.) are combined, driven by automated algorithms, the value of the entire blockchain network will be more rapid The way is flowing, and the evolution based on various financial innovations will happen like a chemical reaction, thereby providing users with more powerful structured products to increase returns or reduce risks.

This is where the charm and imagination of encrypted structured products lie.

Disclaimer: As a blockchain information platform, the articles published on this site only represent the author’s personal views, and have nothing to do with the position of ChainNews. The information, opinions, etc. in the article are for reference only, and are not intended as or regarded as actual investment advice.

Categories
News

New DeFi Species: Understanding the Design Highlights of ESD (www.blockcast.cc)

ESD has features similar to “DeFi ETF”. While possessing DeFi value capture features, its token price volatility is lower. These two features make it a high-quality super-current collateral.

Written by: Complement Capital
Translation: Lu Jiangfei

This article will introduce Empty Set Dollar (ESD) in detail and why it is a very important DeFi project.

  • In the ESD project document, they claim that ESD is a “decentralized self-stabilizing dollar”;
  • Robert Leshner, the founder of Compound Finance, called it “a new algorithmic stable currency”;
  • In the ESD white paper, it is also referred to as “flexible supply stable currency”.

So, what exactly is ESD? We believe that it is one of the most important components in the DeFi industry.

New DeFi Species: Understanding the Design Highlights of ESD

ESD overview

Before officially entering the topic, let’s first give a brief explanation of the following parameters that will be mentioned, such as:

  1. “Epoch” cycle
  2. Coupon validity period
  3. Guaranteed token holder (bonded token holder) supply allocation percentage
  4. Guaranteed liquidity provider

These settings may be affected by governance changes. Some parameter values ​​used in this article only represent the parameter values ​​at the time of writing (November 4, 2020). This article was also updated on November 4 to reflect the debt approved by the ESD governance vote on November 3 Mechanism changes.

Let us enter the topic below.

What exactly is ESD?

ESD is an encrypted token with coding rules for supply expansion, so it can be regarded as an algorithm token or a flexible supply token. However, none of these descriptions can accurately capture the basic core theme of ESD, namely: anonymous, “self-interested” individual collections. ESD is a very reliable dollar mechanism that allows the dollar to be represented on the chain. The form is more stable, you can think of it as a kind of “synthetic dollar” (USD “synthetic”), always consistent with the US dollar. ESD does not need the support of a 1:1 anchor reserve, but a stable asset, and a “by-product” based on a series of rules that encourage human behavior.

Let’s start with an in-depth discussion on how it works.

Empty Set Dollar, ESD for short, is a synthetic asset, just like MakerDAO’s DAI or Synthentix’s sUSD. The goal of ESD is to keep prices stable by tracking the value of the dollar. In addition, there is a USDC-ESD liquidity pool on Uniswap that will be used as an ESD price prediction machine. According to the ESD design mechanism, the supply of ESD can be continuously expanded to ensure that the number of ESD and USDC in the liquidity pool is always equal, so that the value of 1 ESD can be consistent with 1 USDC (or 1 USD legal tender).

Side note: ESD currently sets an “8-hour” cycle, that is, every eight hours is an “epoch”. During the “epoch” transition, the ESD smart contract will check the price of ESD tokens. It should be noted that the ESD price will not be evaluated when the “epoch” boundary switches instantaneously, because doing so can easily lead to its price being manipulated. In fact, ESD uses the Uniswap Time Weighted Average Price (TWAP) algorithm, so its measured price should be the average of the previous eight hours and multiplied by the weighted value of each price stay time.

In order to give everyone an intuitive understanding of the way USD works, let’s take an example: Suppose the ESD token price remains at $1.05 for the first six hours of a certain period, and then remains at $1.02 for the next two hours, then According to the time-weighted average price algorithm, the time-weighted average price of ESD is approximately $1.0425, namely:

1.02+(1.05-1.02)*0.75

Even if a buyer purchases a large amount of ESD tokens two minutes before the end of the “epoch” and pushes the token price to $1.50, the impact on the time-weighted average price is completely negligible.

If the value of ESD exceeds 1 USDC, the smart contract will think that the market demand for ESD tokens is too high, and the supply of tokens in this era cannot meet the current market, so it will increase the supply by minting more ESD tokens ( We will explain in detail how to distribute the supply of newly minted tokens in a later article). Then, in each subsequent “epoch” cycle, the ESD agreement will continue to increase the supply until the total supply is consistent with the total demand, in which case the ESD price will fall back to $1. But when there are too many new tokens minted or external demand drops, then the price of ESD will fall below $1. Since the ESD agreement cannot know whether the supply is growing too fast, or whether there is some external reason that causes the demand to fall, it has introduced a unique mechanism called “coupons” that can help the system restore a fixed exchange rate.

New DeFi Species: Understanding the Design Highlights of ESD

But before introducing the “coupon” mechanism, we need to introduce another related concept: debt.

“Debt” and “Coupon”

When an “epoch” period ends and the time-weighted average price price is less than $1, the ESD agreement generates debt. Debt will continue to accumulate in the agreement over time. Therefore, if the ESD price falls below the anchor exchange rate for multiple “epochs” periods, the debt will grow larger. In this case, the accumulated debt will capture the lack of demand over time. Until the debt is paid off, no new ESD tokens can be allocated. When the ESD price exceeds the fixed exchange rate, any newly created supply of ESD tokens will be repaid with “coupons” before being distributed to token holders, and then the debt will be repaid.

If there is not enough capacity in the market to purchase ESD for less than $1 and restore the pegged exchange rate, you can use “coupons” as a backup plan. If the price stays below $1 for a long time, ESD will evaluate whether it needs to solve the problem through other methods to ensure the continuous development of the project.

“Coupons” can incentivize token holders to voluntarily destroy ESD tokens and are also a voucher that can be exchanged for ESD in the future. These “coupons” can be purchased at discounted prices. Although “coupon” holders take certain risks, offering discounts can also be regarded as a reward. During the downturn in market demand, the discount of “coupons” is not strong, because ESD token holders have little incentive to take the risk of buying coupons. However, as debt accumulates more and more, the discount of “coupons” will become more and more powerful, which means that people who buy “coupons” can get more attractive returns. But there is a very important issue that needs attention, that is: the coupon will expire within 90 “epoch” cycles (currently equivalent to 30 calendar days)! This means that “coupon” buyers must be very confident in ESD and firmly believe that the insufficient supply of ESD tokens is temporary, otherwise, their investment in “coupons” will all disappear. Therefore, “coupons” are not intended to be used by retail investors in essence, but are expected to allow professional investors to assume the role of buying. If you want to understand this problem, you need to take a step back and first look at how the ESD system works.

We can think of accumulated debt as a “memory” of the system, and every debt is a “memory” of a difficult period. However, debt does not want to be a mechanism for stabilizing the price of ESD. The real stabilization mechanism should be the market’s belief in the ESD system, that is, ESD should be anchored to the value of 1 USD from beginning to end, as long as it falls below 1 USD , Traders can buy ESD tokens at low prices and sell them at anchor prices for profit. The profit calculation is based on whether the difference between the current market price and the dollar is maintained for a longer time than the trader expected and the ESD has not returned to the dollar. The debt mechanism provides enough time for the system to calculate the decline in demand so that the system can estimate how many “coupons” to issue. Once we return to the fixed exchange rate, the debt will be reset to zero and no new “coupons” can be issued at this time. If the ESD price falls below the anchor exchange rate again, the “coupon” cycle will start again, and debt will accumulate from zero. At this time, the discount of the “coupon” will also become lower.

On the other hand, the “coupon” design idea is actually to hope that ESD will restore the pegged exchange rate after it has been below the pegged exchange rate for a long time. Investors can buy debt because they firmly believe that demand will increase or is about to increase. They will make a decision based on their “game experience”. If they are wrong, failing to pay off their debts before redeeming the “coupons” means that all the ESD they have invested in buying debt will be lost. If they are correct, they will make a fortune. The benefits include:

  1. (Below face value) The difference between the ESD transaction price and $1;
  2. Additional ESD brought by “coupons” discounts.

Investors who purchase “coupons” can also do things that the ESD agreement itself cannot do, for example, they can create their own needs. In fact, ESD believes that only those who have a large amount of money can effectively use “coupons”: they buy tokens to push up prices and keep prices above the anchor exchange rate until the debt is paid off and the “coupons” are redeemed ——This is also one of the main reasons why ESD is not a purely algorithmic stable currency. ESD is more like a system that combines algorithms and incentives for user behavior to achieve price stability. Therefore, it is not recommended for inexperienced investors to use “coupons”, because if they cannot accurately determine when to buy coupons, they are likely to suffer huge losses.

“Coupons” also play a role in another typical situation, namely: ESD tokens are traded at prices lower than the anchor exchange rate for a long time. Assuming that the transaction price of ESD in the three “epochs” cycle is 0.98 US dollars, it seems to be no big deal, but this situation will cause trouble for some ESD users who need to close their positions but do not want to bear the price shock, because debt will It accumulates in three “epochs” cycles, so “coupon” discounts will increase, causing arbitrageurs to step in and make profits. Some people have previously obtained a “small gain” by pulling the price back to the pegged exchange rate, but obviously, the profitability does not seem to satisfy the arbitrageurs. However, the additional “coupon” incentive measures are enough to allow many people to change the transaction decision from “no transaction” to “transaction”. If still not attracting enough people to trade, the “coupon” discount will continue to rise until the arbitrage opportunity is sufficiently attractive to traders.

Once the price stabilization mechanism comes into play, market demand will return again, and the price of ESD tokens may begin to climb above $1. As long as the time-weighted average price ends above $1 in each “epoch” cycle, a new supply of ESD tokens will be created and the debt will be reset to zero. These newly supplied tokens will first fill the ESD liquidity pool and redeem for “coupons.” At this time, “coupon” holders can redeem ESD on a first-come, first-served basis. Only when enough minted ESDs cover the redeemed “coupons”, new ESD tokens will be minted. At this point, we return to the question mentioned during the token distribution, namely: Which users are lucky enough to get the newly minted ESD tokens?

In order to answer this question, we must delve into the Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO).

ESD governance system

ESD is decentralized and has been created based on on-chain governance from day 1. That is to say, the protocol can only be upgraded after a quorum of token holders has voted. Those who participate in the decentralized autonomous organization need to invest in token binding. If the token supply expands in the future, then:

  1. 80% of the newly minted tokens will be distributed proportionally to the people participating in the decentralized autonomous organization;
  2. The remaining 20% ​​will be allocated to those who provide liquidity in the Uniswap ESD-USDC fund pool.

Of course, liquidity providers (LP) must bind their Uniswap liquidity pool tokens to earn rewards. However, by binding ESD and Uniswap liquidity pool tokens, these token holders will be subject to some restrictions. For example, after unbinding, users who pledge tokens in decentralized autonomous organizations and users who provide liquidity in Uniswap must wait for the end of an “epoch” cycle to transfer their tokens, and those who participate in governance voting Tokens bound to members of decentralized autonomous organizations will also be locked until the voting result is confirmed.

Will the ESD agreement work as expected?

New DeFi Species: Understanding the Design Highlights of ESD

So far, can the design mechanism of the ESD protocol work as expected? The above is a very typical decentralized self-stable system diagram, you can see it in any books related to “self-stable” systems. The idea of ​​this chart is that the initial response speed of many control systems may be very slow in the initial stage. In this case, the system will overshoot and then lower the target value. In fact, a “self-stabilizing” system generally responds to fluctuations by adjusting some internal states to reduce the amplitude of fluctuations, until the final control agency controls the target value of the system within a small range.

Link Wen’s Note: The overshoot is also called the maximum deviation (maximum deviation). Deviation refers to the difference between the adjusted parameter and the given value. For a stable fixed value adjustment system, the maximum deviation of the transition process is the difference A between the first peak value of the adjusted parameter and the given value. The indicator B of overshoot is often used in the follow-up adjustment system. When y(∞) is not equal to the given value: overshoot=[Y(Tm)-Y(∞)]/Y(∞)×100%, (A—maximum deviation; B—overshoot).

ESD is currently in this process, so we don’t know what its future results will be, but ESD is about to enter the end of the second complete cycle. Here is the history of the system so far: As you can see, the “hit value” in the first cycle reached a maximum of $24. In fact, in the boot phase, that is, before CoinGecko added support for ESD tokens, the ESD token transaction price even soared to a higher point (by the way, this is a reasonable estimate based on the high inflation rate during the boot period). And in the second cycle (which looks like a small wave compared to the first cycle), you will see that the ESD token price is closer to $1 than in the first cycle.

New DeFi Species: Understanding the Design Highlights of ESD

Let’s take a closer look at the second cycle to gain a deeper understanding of what’s happening:

New DeFi Species: Understanding the Design Highlights of ESD

We can see that in the second cycle, ESD tokens once reached a peak of about US$2.40, and dropped to US$0.43 at the lowest. (In fact, the price of ESD tokens may suddenly fall even lower, but CoinGecko data does not Record), and then restored to the anchor exchange rate on November 3, 2020.

So far, we can see that the trend of ESD tokens is in line with expectations, and the initial design of the protocol seems to work well. The agreement can also be adjusted appropriately, and it is hoped that appropriate governance decisions can be made to change certain system parameters and adjust incentive measures.

But it is foreseeable that as we go through more cycles, the ESD system will build sufficient market confidence, so traders can set prices based on the anchor exchange rate to get the expected return, so they may be more inclined to stay below the anchor exchange rate Buy ESD and sell above the anchor exchange rate. In fact, the predictability of the ESD system will attract more professional arbitrageurs. Over time, the competition among arbitrageurs will gradually weaken, making the pegged exchange rate of ESD tokens more stable.

High quality super current mortgage

Although we have also seen a variety of interesting decentralized stablecoin designs (such as Terra, Celo, MakerDAO), in the market share scheme, centralized “players” such as USDC, Tether and Binance still have huge Advantages (as shown in the figure below). Centralized stablecoins may be subject to regulatory and potential review risks. Therefore, the cryptocurrency market needs a truly decentralized stablecoin.

New DeFi Species: Understanding the Design Highlights of ESD

But why can ESD tokens become one of the key components of the emerging DeFi economy? The main reason is: ESD tokens may become a high-quality collateral.

For most DeFi projects, high-quality collateral is essential. When users borrow encrypted assets on DeFi lending platforms such as Compound, Yield, Mainframe, and Aave, or forge synthetic assets on MakerDAO, Synthetix, and UMA, the quality of collateral will have a significant impact on user experience and user benefits. In order for everyone to better understand this point, the following will compare ESD and “DeFi mortgage king” ETH.

When we use ETH as collateral, price fluctuations are the main problem that everyone needs to face. The price of ETH fluctuates sharply over time, and sometimes the price even drops sharply, which may lead to a sharp drop in the value of the mortgage, which in turn triggers forced liquidation. Therefore, when users use ETH as collateral, they have to invest more ETH (sometimes even more than the minimum requirements of the system) for collateral, which will cause a very serious problem of inefficient use of capital. To make matters worse, the borrower/trader will now be asked for a margin call by the trading platform. If they do not provide more collateral or cannot repay the loan within a short period of time, then their collateral will be within a few minutes Cleared by the trading platform. For collateral providers, this is a very bad user experience, but what is even more frightening is that this method is likely to trigger panic selling of collateral, which in turn will cause irreparable systemic risks. The price drop will also cause a chain reaction, and other ETH holders will also choose to sell, which will trigger more margin calls, resulting in a cascading effect of lower prices. On the other hand, the current Ethereum blockchain also has certain limitations, and network congestion will also cause the problem to be further exacerbated.

So, what happens if we don’t use ETH, but use stablecoins as collateral? One of the most direct results is to eliminate people’s worries about collateral price fluctuations, and there is no need to worry about huge losses caused by forced liquidation. When traders lose money in synthetic trading and cannot meet the margin call requirements, they can deal with the situation calmly and cautiously instead of selling urgently, because everyone believes that the collateral will continue to maintain its value. Even if the stable currency falls below the pegged exchange rate, this situation may only be temporary. Therefore, the agreement/lender/dealer-that is, the counterparty of the synthetic transaction-also knows that the trader can sell the stablecoin collateral at the appropriate time. But the problem is that stablecoin collateral also has shortcomings. One of them is that users cannot get a return after the stablecoin is locked. Therefore, the capital efficiency of using stablecoin as collateral is also very low, which in turn leads to unsatisfactory return on investment.

Dan Eric policy (Dan Elitzer) wrote in his ” superfluid mortgage ” (Superfluid Collateral) article proposed a solution to the problem of capital efficiency. In the model given by Dan Eritzer, the collateral is secured, but at the same time the collateral is liquid. In a sense, the secured collateral can be reserved for mortgage transactions and may be liquid in a short period of time. From another perspective, the secured collateral is liquid, but at the same time it can be used for lending transactions and gaining income in some way. Doesn’t this effectively solve the capital efficiency problem mentioned earlier? Okay, yes, but maybe we can do better-

When I use ETH as collateral, it means that I hold a position in an asset, and the asset price may increase with the overall growth of the DeFi ecosystem. Under this model, the role of ETH is somewhat similar to that of stocks, because it captures value through the growth of the cryptocurrency market, and this growth is also highly correlated. Holding ETH is a bit like buying a DeFi “exchange traded fund”, so this is actually what users can get from ETH collateral. They hope to mortgage ETH to get high profits, but they find that the DeFi market may grow Will exceed the rate of return they earn, so people need to be able to act as super-current collateral for the “DeFi Exchange Traded Fund”-and this is the problem that ESD hopes to solve.

As the market demand for ESD tokens continues to increase, the value of ESD secured tokens will also continue to grow. Therefore, if ESD becomes one of the leading decentralized stablecoins in DeFi (yes! This is a great possibility!), the market demand for ESD tokens may keep pace with the growth of DeFi. Moreover, if the ESD token can prove its price stability (yes, this is more likely!), then the volatility problem will disappear, the over-collateralization problem will be solved, and the resulting systemic risk will also end. Collateral providers no longer need to be bound by margin requirements. You will find that the DeFi user experience has become better after the introduction of ESD tokens.

When a certain agreement accepts ESD tokens as collateral, the agreement understands that ESD’s stabilization mechanism can ensure that the value of tokens quickly returns to the anchor exchange rate state, so even if sometimes the price of ESD tokens is lower than the anchor price, the agreement will give a certain tolerance degree.

In fact, ESD and ETH have the same characteristics as “DeFi ETF”, but while possessing DeFi value capture characteristics, the price volatility of ESD tokens is lower-there is no doubt that these two characteristics make it one This kind of high-quality super-current collateral is more attractive in the market than other collaterals.

What risks need attention?

Finally, we have to discuss a question, are there any shortcomings in ESD tokens? Well, ESD does have some problems, mainly the following three:

First, the biggest competitors of ESD tokens are MakerDAO and centralized stablecoins. At the same time, the decentralized stable currency market is heating up, with a large number of new opponents pouring in every week, so market competition will become increasingly fierce. ESD may not grow with the growth of the DeFi market, which brings some risks.

Second, in the long run, whether ESD tokens can continue to maintain a “stable” state is still unknown, but as ESD token holders gradually adjust the system dynamics, the stability mechanism may be further developed. But it should be noted that the stability mechanism may not work, especially considering that the DeFi “hacker army” has been trying to destabilize the mechanism.

Third, the price volatility of ETH may also decrease over time. In this case, ETH can still maintain its dominant market position as the “King of Mortgage”. These are potential risks that exist in reality.

However, we are still optimistic about the future vision of ESD, and can’t wait to see how this project will develop further. With ESD tokens:

  1. Users can invest in tokens that grow with the growth of DeFi;
  2. When users need to spend ESD tokens, they can benefit from its stable price;
  3. When users lock ESD tokens in the lending market, synthetic trading applications, and other new DeFi protocols, higher returns can be obtained.

In our opinion, this is an amazing innovation!

If you want to experience ESD, you can get the ESD application on the website ; if you want to read the white paper, you can visit here .

Information disclosure: The Complement Capital team is the holder of ESD tokens.

Source link: complementcap.substack.com

Categories
News

Understanding the new species ARC: Everything is OK MakerDAO (www.blockcast.cc)

The founder of the personal token “Kerman” launched another bold experiment to achieve debt composability.

Written by: Kerman Kohli, founder of ARC and DeFiweekly Compiler: Perry Wang

Since entering the field of cryptocurrency, I have been passionate about the idea of ​​synthetic assets and its potential impact on the ecosystem. MakerDAO is an inspiration. It is regarded as the central bank of the Ethereum ecosystem, allowing unlicensed borrowing of USD-denominated debt-known as DAI. At the same time, Synthetix has shown the world the power of a token-based incentive structure, which can quickly and strategically roll out the network and coordinate everything needed when needed. Synthetix achieved this goal by introducing a 4-year inflation (that is, additional issuance) timetable for native network tokens, and then allocating a larger share to active participants in the target growth plan.

But the main limitation of these two systems is that they are dominated by the first collateral that was initially invested and locked in. Although both currently have or plan to add more collateral types, MakerDAO will always be dominated by ETH, and Synthetix will always be dominated by SNX. Both projects have good reasons for doing so-the riskier collateral type will lead to the risk of paralysis of the entire system or enhance the value proposition of the native token. Another benefit of this design is that the aggregated liquidity model can create a better user experience and positive network effects.

When thinking about this problem space, the reason for breaking the model of “all assets must be pooled into a capital pool” is to see the success of Uniswap v2 and Curve capital pools, and the fact that liquidity is not as dispersed as people think. So I thought: “Why not go deeper and use the same idea for synthetic assets?”

Everything is MakerDAO

Understand the new species ARC: Everything is OK MakerDAO

If you ask me “what is ARC in one sentence”, I will answer “Everything is MakerDAO”.

What does that mean?

Well, the idea is really simple. If you have a synthetic asset pool, you store a mortgage asset in it, and you will get a single output asset.

输入ERC20 代币→ 拿到ERC20-USD

The idea of ​​this model is that a debt universe can actually be created based on each token that exists, while fine-tuning the risk parameters surrounding each token, so as not to cause compound risks in the global system. For example, the first asset in the system is LINKUSD, a synthetic U.S. dollar collateralized by Chainlink. Yes, it is supported by Chainlink oracle. (Read the game file for more details about the oracle and the asset)

Anyone can provide price information on the chain through some valuable collateral and create synthetic assets. If we look back at the history of encryption, although decentralized exchanges like IDEX / EtherDelta do not require a license, they still have gatekeepers to handle the listing. ARC’s goal is to do what Uniswap / Balancer does in a decentralized exchange-let anyone create debt based on their own parameters.

Of course, there are many such ways in reality, but if you create a permissionless technology, you can always add elements of trust to ensure user safety. (To learn more about use cases and details, please view the game paper directly at the following URL)

Challenges in bringing ARC to market

Although the product has very interesting features, the token distribution mechanism itself is also true. When I was working on the ARC project, I saw the way Andre Cronje released YFI. When I saw the possibility of community management agreement, I was very excited.

I personally spend a lot of time on the governance forum, following related proposals in real time, which I haven’t done in any other projects. What I didn’t expect was that many talented people also participated in the YFI Governance Forum.

If you accept the simple idea: the people behind the project will determine the success or failure of the project, then you need to optimize to attract the highest level of talent and community members to participate in your project.

Most DeFi project communities are made up of founders, investors, and team members—everyone else may hope to see token prices rise without spending a lot of their own energy. Obviously, over time, the community governance agreement will produce more benefits, and these benefits are not available to their “centralized” opponents, because everyone feels that they can enter the grassroots of the project, and later Will not be abandoned.

Considering this information, my first instinct is to code the smart contract + front-end and publish it without auditing. However, considering that I have spent a lot of time in this field, smart contract hackers are devastating to all relevant personnel. Once a problem occurs, it may be severely injured and unable to recover. I don’t want to waste the future of ARC just because I don’t have audit and all operating expenses. I want to build long-term products instead of short-term speculation. However, when designing the community management agreement, it does not seem to be the right direction for early investors to transfer 10-20% of the tokens to raise 2 million US dollars and provide the other 20-30% of the tokens to the team. The supply of tokens will be controlled by internal personnel, and token sales pressure will be generated from the beginning. In my opinion, the current two feasible methods seem to be:

  1. The community management agreement, but the motivation for the founder or the future team to move forward is very limited. Andre spent nearly $100,000 of his own funds to put YFI into operation, and as the owner, he has only a small share in YFI. The treasury will always have $500,000, but the ability of full-time team members to contribute is limited because they cannot profit from the rise in YFI.
  2. The agreement supported by venture capital funds VC can obtain early capital, but at the expense of the community. The founders and team members are highly motivated, but everyone feels that they have really made 2-3 VCs rich. At the same time, not all VCs are bad. Some VCs can increase the chances of the network getting the key things it needs.

Design a better token distribution mechanism

After several weeks of meticulous research on the key factors that can be optimized, I decided:

  1. Raise the minimum amount of funds for myself and a small team for review and start-up in order to maintain operations for 6 to 12 months. This includes getting the right combination of supporters throughout the ecosystem to help guide me through the ups and downs of the project. .
  2. Ensure that ARC can be owned by the community for a long time, and have appropriate incentives for people to enter the grassroots.
  3. Contributors can get more benefits from the rising trend of ARC tokens, so if feasible, the project can self-fund and attract suitable team members to ensure that it is the driving force of DeFi in the next few years.

So what model did I end up with? After talking with the above experts and the most experienced people, I summarized the following patterns:

  • ARC tokens can only be obtained by using the protocol itself-also known as yield farming. No pre-mining can ensure that no one has any preemptive advantage before the project is released. Inflation will be used as a strategic tool to expand the network as needed.
  • Within 4 years, 1/3 of all tokens minted in real time will enter ARC DAO, which will provide incentives to future team members, investors and myself. After 4 years, the community can decide whether to delete the percentage or change its distribution.
  • The remaining 2/3 will be owned by the community to ensure that the tokens held by insiders are always in the minority, and compared with other protocols, the network will not risk being controlled by insiders. Initially, control of the agreement will be in the hands of the team and myself, but certain decisions will be open to community governance. This is intentional, because I hope that ARC will iterate quickly, and I can use my expertise as a founder to get ARC into a stable position in the short term. My long-term goal is to be a silent, occasional voice in the community, like Vitalik.
  • To deploy the network, a small part of the tokens issued in the future will be sold by ARC DAO. This means that only if the DAO gets the token (the user farms the token), the supporter can get the token.
    • As of now, 5.41% of the future (4 years) issued tokens have been sold in the community fundraising round for a total of US$406,000. The ecosystem has a total of 29 supporters, with an average contribution of USD 13,000 and a maximum contribution of USD 40,000.
    • In addition, 1% of the future (4 years) issued tokens (4 years) will be distributed to the holders of $KERMAN. I will write a detailed article on the Medium blog soon.
    • The remaining 26.92% will be held by ARC DAO.

ARC games

Now that we have resolved all the tricky details, there is another aspect of ARC that needs to be discussed. ARC is not only a protocol, but also a game.

If there is one thing in the DeFi field that makes us more and more popular, it is the “gamification” of active network participation, which is a very powerful collaboration tool. The “Rescue YAM” progress bar we saw a few weeks ago gave a good example, but until now, no one has really tried to fully adopt this game concept-until me.

The goal of the game is simple, people must work together to create a new asset class. The ARCx host will set a “level” for the network according to everything needed for growth, and the game players will achieve the goal. You can play games with other players, and the value of ARC tokens will continue to rise. Let me briefly demonstrate an example of the level target:

  • Level 1 = Create 1 million USD of LINKUSD
  • Level 2 = LINKUSD expanded to 10 million USD
  • Level 3 = Add RENBTC as collateral and create 1 million USD of RENBTCUSD
  • Level 4 = RENBTCUSD expanded to 100 million USD

The higher the game level, the more meta: the community will become the master of the game. Here is a glimpse of its appearance:

Understand the new species ARC: Everything is OK MakerDAO

10-year vision

In the field of encryption, it is hard to imagine what will happen in two years, but it may take 10 years to reach its ultimate vision. ARC aims to unlock the value storage function of Bitcoin by creating a stable debt exchange medium, making Bitcoin’s initial vision of growing into P2P digital cash into reality, and all this is done with the support of Ethereum.

ARC’s ultimate network idea is to create a universe of issuable debt.

I predict that by 2030, the world will issue trillions of dollars in mortgage-based special stablecoins/debts. No need to sell any crypto assets you own at that time because you can use them to issue debts and pay bills. My ultimate goal is to let the core team become the historical past of the network, and let the community run ARC with a high degree of maturity and motivation.

As we see more and more valuable types of collateral enter the Ethereum network, the potential debt creation market may be very, very large.

What’s next?

At present, our smart contract is being audited by Quantstamp. After the audit, we will gradually introduce the fuse mechanism in stages to limit the amount of funds that the system can hold. Once we are confident that the system will operate as expected, we can enter the time for yield farming. All of this will happen soon, so stay tuned.